Louisiana Lemon Law Statutes RS 51:1941 - RS 51:1948

RS 51:1941 Definitions

The following definitions apply when used in this Chapter:

(1) “Collateral costs” means sales tax, license fees, and registration fees and any similar governmental charges.

(2) “Consumer” means:

(a) The purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, of a new motor vehicle normally used for personal, family, or household purposes and subject to a manufacturer’s express warranty.

(b) A person, other than for purposes of resale, to whom a motor vehicle is transferred during the duration of an express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle.

(c) A person to whom a motor vehicle is leased.

(d) Any other person entitled to enforce the warranty.

(3) “Dealer” means a person authorized by the manufacturer and actively engaged in the business of buying, selling, or exchanging new automobiles, new personal watercraft, or new all-terrain vehicles at retail and who has an established place of business.

(4) “Manufacturer” means any person, firm, association, corporation, or trust, resident or nonresident, who manufactures or assembles new and unused motor vehicles.

(5) “Manufacturer’s express warranty” and “warranty” mean the written warranty of the manufacturer of a new motor vehicle of its condition and fitness for use, including any terms or conditions precedent to the enforcement of an obligation under that warranty.

(6) “Motor vehicle” means a passenger motor vehicle or a passenger and commercial motor vehicle as defined in R.S. 32:1252, sold in this state on or after September 1, 1984. “Motor vehicle” shall include a personal watercraft as defined in R.S. 34:855.2 and an all-terrain vehicle as defined in R.S. 32:1252, sold in this state or still under warranty on or after August 15, 1999, which is used exclusively for personal and not commercial purposes. For the purposes of this Chapter, the following motor vehicles are excluded:

(a) Motor vehicles 10,000 GVW or above.

(b) Motor vehicles used exclusively for commercial purposes.

(7) “Nonconformity” means any specific or generic defect or malfunction, or any defect or condition which substantially impairs the use, market value or both of a motor vehicle.

Acts 1984, No. 228, §1; Acts 1986, No. 553, §1; Acts 1999, No. 933, §1; Acts 1999, No. 1048, §1, eff. July 9, 1999; Acts 2021, No. 220, §2.

RS 51:1942 Manufacturer’s duty to repair; nonconformity

If a new motor vehicle does not conform to an applicable express warranty, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer or any of its authorized motor vehicle dealers and makes the motor vehicle available for repair before the expiration of the warranty or during a period of one year following the date of the original delivery of the motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer shall make such repairs as are necessary to conform the vehicle to such warranty, notwithstanding the fact that such repairs are made after the expiration of such terms or such one-year period.

Acts 1984, No. 228, §1.

RS 51:1943 Express warranties; time limit to conform

A.(1) It shall be presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties if the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a cumulative total of forty-five or more calendar days or the same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times by the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer within the warranty term or during a period of one year following the date of the original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever is the earlier date.

(2) If a manufacturer fails to respond to the consumer or to perform the repairs within the time periods described in this Subsection, such manufacturer shall be considered to have waived his rights to a final attempt to cure the nonconformity.

B. The term of an express warranty shall be extended by any period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or natural disaster.

C. The provisions in Subsection A of this Section shall be suspended for any period of time during which repair services cannot be performed by the manufacturer, its agents, or authorized dealer because of war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or natural disaster.

Acts 1984, No. 228, §1; Acts 1999, No. 933, §1; Acts 2008, No. 701, §1; Acts 2021, No. 220, §2.

RS 51:1944 Motor vehicle replacement or refund

A. If after four or more attempts within the express warranty term or during a period of one year following the date of the original delivery to the consumer of a motor vehicle, whichever is the earlier, the nonconformity has not been repaired or if the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a cumulative total of forty-five or more calendar days during the warranty period, the manufacturer shall:

(1) Replace the motor vehicle with a comparable new motor vehicle, or, at its option,

(2) Accept return of the motor vehicle and refund the full purchase price plus any amounts paid by the consumer at the point of sale, and all collateral costs less a reasonable allowance for use to the consumer, or any holder of a perfected security interest in the motor vehicle, as their interest may appear, if the transaction was a sale.

B. If the transaction is a lease, the provisions of Paragraph (1) of Subsection (A) of this Section are applicable or the manufacturer may, if the lessor is willing, accept return of the motor vehicle and reimburse the lessee for all reasonable expenditures in connection with the lease, and further satisfy all conditions of the lease in connection with early termination and related charges. The lessee shall be liable for a reasonable allowance for use of the vehicle prior to the return thereof.

C. A reasonable allowance for use shall be that amount directly attributable to use by the consumer prior to his first notice of nonconformity to the manufacturer, agent, or dealer and during any subsequent period when the vehicle is not out of service by reason of repair.

D. If a manufacturer has established an informal dispute settlement procedure which substantially complies with the provisions of Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 703, as from time to time amended, the provisions of Subsections (A), (B) and (C) of this Section concerning refunds or replacement shall not apply to any consumer who has not first resorted to such procedure.

E. The consumer shall have no more than three years from the date he purchased the motor vehicle or until one year from the end of the warranty period, whichever is longer, in which to file suit against the manufacturer to force compliance with the provisions of this Section.

Acts 1984, No. 228, §1; Acts 1986, No. 553, §1; Acts 1995, No. 1136, §1; Acts 1999, No. 933, §1; Acts 2021, No. 220, §2.

RS 51:1945 Transfer of title; time limitation

At the time of receiving the comparable new motor vehicle or refund under R.S. 51:1944, the consumer, or lessor, where applicable, shall surrender the motor vehicle subject to the nonconformity to the manufacturer together with the certificate of title with all endorsements necessary to transfer title to the manufacturer.  The manufacturer shall provide the consumer, or lessor, where applicable, with a comparable new motor vehicle or refund within thirty days after an offer to transfer title in compliance with this Section by the consumer, or lessor, where applicable, or within thirty days after a decision by the informal dispute settlement procedure established by the manufacturer to award a refund or replacement.

Acts 1984, No. 228, §1; Acts 1986, No. 553, §1.

RS 51:1945.1 Mandatory disclosure of nonconformity to warranty by sellers

A.(1)  Upon the sale or transfer of title by a manufacturer, its agent, or any dealer of any second-hand motor vehicle, previously returned to a manufacturer for nonconformity to its warranty pursuant to the requirements of this Chapter, the manufacturer shall execute and deliver to the buyer an instrument in writing in a form prescribed by the commissioner setting forth the following information in ten point, all capital type:

“IMPORTANT:  THIS VEHICLE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER OR DEALER BECAUSE IT DID NOT CONFORM TO ITS WARRANTY AND THE DEFECT OR CONDITION WAS NOT FIXED WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED BY LOUISIANA LAW.”

(2)  Such notice that a vehicle was returned to the manufacturer because it did not conform to its warranty shall also be conspicuously printed on the motor vehicle’s certificate of title.

B.  The failure of a dealer to deliver to the buyer the instrument required by this Section shall constitute a violation of this Chapter and shall be punishable by a fine of not less than five hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars for each violation.

Acts 1992, No. 603, §1.

RS 51:1946 Other remedies

Nothing in this Chapter shall in any way limit the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer under any other law.

Acts 1984, No. 228, §1.

RS 51:1947 Attorney fees

If the motor vehicle does not conform to applicable express warranties after the consumer has complied with the requirements of this Chapter, the consumer shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees actually incurred if a judgment is rendered in part or whole in his favor.

Acts 1985, No. 169, §1.

RS 51:1948 Manufacturer’s duty to provide reimbursement for temporary replacement vehicle; penalties

A. Whenever a motor vehicle which is covered by a manufacturer’s express warranty is tendered by a consumer to the dealer from whom it was purchased or exchanged for the repair of any defect, malfunction, or nonconformity to which the warranty is applicable and at least one of the following conditions exists, the manufacturer shall provide directly to the consumer for the duration of the repair period a rental vehicle reimbursement of up to twenty dollars per day:

(1) The repair period exceeds ten work days, including the day on which the motor vehicle is tendered to the dealer for repair.

(2) The defect, malfunction, or nonconformity is the same for which the motor vehicle has been tendered to the dealer for repair on two previous occasions.

B. The provisions of this Section regarding a manufacturer’s duty shall extend only for the period of the length of the manufacturer’s express warranty or for two years, whichever period of time occurs first.

C. For violations of the provisions of Subsection A, the consumer shall be entitled to recover from the manufacturer for damages incurred and reasonable attorney fees actually incurred; however, in no event shall the amount of damages awarded be less than two hundred dollars. The provisions of this Section will become effective as to cars sold after January 1, 1987, and will not be in effect in case of war, work stoppages, and natural disasters beyond the control of the manufacturer that would prevent the timely repair or parts delivery to a dealer.

D. This Section shall not apply to personal watercraft or all-terrain vehicles tendered to a manufacturer for repair.

E. Repealed by Acts 2021, No. 220, §3.

Acts 1986, No. 1058, §1; Acts 1999, No. 933, §1; Acts 1999, No. 1048, §1, eff. July 9, 1999; Acts 2021, No. 220, §3.

STEP 1
Fill Our Form

Fill Our Form
Step 1

STEP 2
Get In Touch

Get In Touch
Step 2

STEP 3
Send Documents

Send Documents
Step 3

STEP 4
Case Evaluation

Case Evaluation
Step 4

Auto Lemon Lawyer Case Evaluation

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

Purchase Type*
Drop files here or
Max. file size: 50 MB.

    Licensed Jurisdictions

    • United States Supreme Court
    • All State Courts in Louisiana
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit

    What Our Clients Have to Say

    • Duck Law Firm represented me when my brand new vehicle left me stranded on muliple occasions with engine problems. I am extemely pleased with Duck Law Firm and how they handled my case. They were very responsive and answered all of my questions.

      Zack Horne Avatar Zack Horne
      June 20, 2023

      I am so pleased with Duck Law Firm and how they handled my case. They were very responsive and I couldn't have asked for better service in dealing with the issues I was having with the dealership. Kevin and his team were very upfront with me about everything from the get go and told me exactly how things would proceed and how long the process would take. This was the first time I have ever had to deal with something like this, and I hope I don't have to go through this again, but if I do, I would call them back in a second. Many thanks to Kevin and his team for making me feel respected, heard and understood.

      Shanie Bourg Avatar Shanie Bourg
      June 11, 2023

      Law firm is very professional very attentive to my needs whenever I called Erin Farnsworth took the time to help and answer any questions or issues I had, I would recommend Kevin duck and I will use Kevin duck in the future , they got my money fast! Also I received more than I thought I would initially get thank you duck law firm especially Erin outstanding job you guys are awesome!

      mark offutt Avatar mark offutt
      June 11, 2023
    • My brand new truck was plagued with transmission issues from the get-go. The manufacturer would not agree to a thorough repair even though it was under warranty. The Duck Law Firm took my case and crushed the large automotive corporation with a decisive monetary victory. Highly Recommended!

      Mark Gillespie Avatar Mark Gillespie
      June 11, 2023

      The Duck Law Firm is a great group to work with. They have always given great advice and guided me through legal troubles like family. I will always send loved ones their way when needing help with personal injury and lemon law assists.

      Emily Milke Avatar Emily Milke
      May 11, 2023

      Great group of people to work with!

      Mallory Gordon Avatar Mallory Gordon
      May 11, 2023
    • Duck Law Firm represented me when my brand new vehicle left me stranded on four occasions. The car company would not let me out of my lease or replace my car. It was clearly a lemon! Duck Law Firm was able to get all the money I paid, including my insurance refunded. If you have any issues with your vehicle, I highly recommend Kevin Duck and the Duck Law Firm.

      Lisa Duhon Avatar Lisa Duhon
      February 11, 2023

      Duck Law Firm helped me receive money back that I didn't know I was entitled to! When my car had to be kept at the dealership due to transmissions issues, Lemon Lawyer made sure I was taken care of financially.

      Ainsley Messina Avatar Ainsley Messina
      February 11, 2023

      I was plagued by a continuous electrical problem on my truck. Brought it to two different dealerships multiple times to no avail. In frustration I turned to Mr Duck's firm and was contacted by Jesse who stayed in contact with me and helped me navigate the lemon law process. I never had a need to explore it before. One time I had questions about some specifics and received a call from Kevin who talked to me for 45 minutes answering all of my questions and explained what to expect. My settlement was far more than I anticipated and even finally got my truck satisfactorily repaired! Highly recommend this firm if you get to the point of having nowhere else to turn.

      Gregg Meaux Avatar Gregg Meaux
      December 11, 2022

     Our Location